Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 23:59
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What lowers a fever the quickest?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Proba-3’s first artificial solar eclipse - European Space Agency
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Write something which is just the opposite of you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
TSA issues warning as they ban certain card at airport security that's owned by millions - UNILAD
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Here’s why exercise is so important if you’re a cancer survivor - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Concerns About the US Economy Continue to Grow While Its Forecasts Shrink - splinter.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Navigating some of the thorny questions of estate planning - NPR